Components, energy use, software support, repairability, substances and e-waste routes.
An electronics passport record should unify model identity, components, substances, energy information, repairability, software support and e-waste routes, while retaining the evidence behind each claim.
Regulatory content reviewed 8 October 2026
The rules below do different jobs. Some are enforceable sector requirements, some establish the DPP architecture, and some announce future product measures. Each card explains the distinction.
Organize the record in stable blocks so identity, technical facts, evidence and access rules can change without losing provenance.
Defines exactly which model, batch or item the record describes.
Bills of materials and supplier declarations
Connects components, materials, suppliers and facilities.
RoHS, REACH and product safety documentation
Holds measured, calculated and declared product attributes with their basis.
Energy-label or ecodesign records where applicable
Maintains repair, use, custody and end-of-life information over time.
Repair manuals, software policy and WEEE information
Bills of materials and supplier declarations · RoHS, REACH and product safety documentation · Energy-label or ecodesign records where applicable · Repair manuals, software policy and WEEE information
A battery passport published on DPP Shield: identifiers, materials, substances of concern, carbon footprint, repair information, six evidence documents and a verifiable credential you can check.
Demonstration data for illustration, not a real product.Identify the exact product, economic-operator role, market and applicable legislation.
Map authoritative source records to stable product, operator and facility identifiers.
Review completeness, consistency, access rights and the evidence behind each claim.
Approve a versioned public view while protecting restricted and personal data.
No. Current obligations vary by product type. ESPR establishes the framework, and product-specific measures determine when a DPP and its precise contents apply.
Yes, where relevant and legally permitted. A preparation workflow should map authoritative existing records instead of asking teams to retype the same facts.
Organize at least four governed blocks: Model, GTIN, serial or batch identity and manufacturer; Components, materials and substances of concern; Energy performance, durability and repairability; Software support, spare parts and end-of-life routes. Every value should retain its source, effective date, product level and review status.
The evidence file should cover Bills of materials and supplier declarations; RoHS, REACH and product safety documentation; Energy-label or ecodesign records where applicable; Repair manuals, software policy and WEEE information. A public view can cite approved evidence without exposing restricted files or confidential data.
Start free with one product, or book a demonstration around your data and supplier workflow.
Leave a message for our team
Tell us how we can help. Our team will reply here.